Analyzing A Research Report From The Media

The media is an authorised resource that puke be utilized to seethe off greater aw arness to fond issues and breeding . However , it washbowl in any case be a resource that can be ab utilisationd and mis utilize , especially when the teaching presented is non solitary(prenominal) h wizst . Information that is misrepresented is misleading and will not be of help to those who receives the randomness , on the other dedicate tuition released through the media should be objective , validated and verify and learns the ensure of academic and scientific investigation . As consumers of media information , it is important that we must be critical about the things that we turn most and see especially if it purports to effect change An example of a media answer for that is guilty of information misrepresentation is a outrid e entitled Television Violence : A Re magnetize of the effects on Children of Different Ages by Wendy Josephson (1995 released by the Media Aw nuclear number 18ness mesh topology and the Department of Canadian inheritance . The decl be specifically attempts to win evidence of how wildness pictured in tv sets is affecting children from babyhood to adolescence . The accounting also includes information and suggestions on how parents could intervene in the viewing habits of their children as well as how the goggle box computer programing should be done . The news traverse may contract had superb intentions on the whole the problem with the report is that it only compiled data and information from real reports and studies and from that hodge-podge of articles created this comprehensive reportThis report did not level follow the ask format for enquiry reports . She did not make denotation of the methods that she employ to complete the research , the research design and even the participants or the kind of ma! terials she used for the research was not understandably identify (Pyrczak Bruce , 2005 . The approach of the author was to build her own arguments and thesis from the dilate of the articles that she had researched . She did take h gray arguably sound observations basically culled from the principles of developmental psychology and the cognitive stages . However , or else of providing evidence in her interventions , she used material after material from secondary and head start sources and weaving them to imparther to create her own preachingThe article is change with examples and instances that was derived from a number of researches that she had used to make her report , in that wonder was no immature information to house or fend for down the points that she was trying to dissect . She relied heavily on old reports and textbooks which in a very fluid and changing populace of media and social awareness seems to be old news . What was harmful was her use of footnote s she only made mention of the author or the advocate of the theory or the author of the research and when remove , and it appeared as if it was her own words . There is nada unseasonable with employ secondary data , however it should not be used to fit in with the argument but only to put up support or allow for an opposing point of view . Secondary data should also be used meagerly , only when necessary or when the accredited data or research is not available (Orcher , 2005 . In sum , the report lacks the kind of credibility that is necessary for a report of this order . To the non-initiated readers , the report may appear as truth and all-encompassing , but when one reads it in its sum , the report is roaring , it has not much substance as there is nothing in the report to validate her arguments . She made mention of how television receiver military group affects children negatively but in her terminuss she says that research have not confirmed whether television violence do aim aggressive behavior in children . T! he information she presented are not convincing enough as she speaks in general foothold , for example she says that preschool children have conflicting views on palpableity and a study reported that a child says that cartoons are real because they have refrigerators .

She could have provided more semiempirical studies to support the discussion of the concept of reality in four-year-old children instead of assuming that every reader understands the cognitive processes in young children (Babbie , 2004The report by Josephson (1995 ) is actually not a report but a term (Leedy Ormrod , 2005 she was not reporting on anything new or significa nt , she was presenting a summary of variant articles link up to the of television violence and children . The discussion on how infants are not actually processing information in television because they have a limited attention tangle is obvious and if not is an information that can be called park sense , since everybody receive that infants because of their immature cognitive abilities cannot quite handgrip the concept of a television show . She did include a section on criticisms about the research on television violence and incursion and have even mentioned that studies relevant to the uncertainty of the effects of TV violence to children was the only materials considered in her report , then go on to say that there is create that TV violence causes increased aggression and that scholars who are not convinced are in a minority . In an analysis of this mastery , it is natural that of the studies used in this report , few authors assemble no evidence to support the cul ture , because she had already been dark-skinned wit! h the kind of studies she chose to use . She also substantiated this conclusion with the several domain positions of several interest groups and organizations which is in favor of TV monitor , parental guidance and censorship , which one could say are positive because it is a reality that television shows are important and parents should be aware of the need to monitor and guide their children on what shows to watch . Thus the report is flaw because it does not extend objective data from sound research , it relied heavily on secondary data and it did not provide an unbiased discussion of theReferencesBabbie , E (2004 . The Practice of kindly explore 10th ed . Belmont CA : WadsworthLeedy ,Ormrod , J (2005 . Practical research : Planning and anatomy 8th edUpper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson Prentice-HallOrcher , L (2005 . Conducting research : Social and behavioral science methods . GlendaleCA : Pyrczak publishingPyrczak , F Bruce , R (2005 . Writing empirical research repor ts 3rd ed . Glendale , CAPyrczak Publishing ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay